Commonwealth v. Edwards, M.
This text of Commonwealth v. Edwards, M. (Commonwealth v. Edwards, M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 116 EAL 2020 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : MARK EDWARDS, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 17th day of August, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all
remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Did not the Superior Court err in construing 42 Pa.C.S. § 9765 in an overly broad manner to bar merger even though all of the elements of the recklessly endangering another person offense are contained within the elements of the statutory alternative of the aggravated assault offense for which the defendant was convicted?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Edwards, M., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-edwards-m-pa-2020.