Commonwealth v. Edison Electric Light & Power Co.
32 A. 419, 170 Pa. 231, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1389
Opinion
The question in this case is substantially the same as that in Commonwealth v. Northern Electric Light and Power Company, reported in 145 Pa. 105. For reasons given in that case the judgment in this case should not be disturbed. We find nothing in the record that requires special notice. 0
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Edison Electric Light & Power Co., 32 A. 419, 170 Pa. 231, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1389 (Pa. 1895).
32 A. 419 (Commonwealth v. Edison Electric Light & Power Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Curry v. Alabama Power Co.
8 So. 2d 521 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1942)
In re Hudson River Electric Power Co.
173 F. 934 (N.D. New York, 1909)
In re Rutland Realty Co.
157 F. 296 (S.D. New York, 1907)
Commonwealth ex rel. McCormick v. Keystone Electric Light, Heat & Power Co.
44 A. 326 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)