Commonwealth v. DYARMAN

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. DYARMAN

41 A.3d 1282, 615 Pa. 169, 2012 WL 1255144, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 831

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. DYARMAN. Read the opinion of the Court — 621 Pa. 88 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 16, 2012·No. 918 MAL 2011·Published

Opinion

*170 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of April 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner is:

Does the admission into evidence of accuracy and calibration certificates for breath test machines violate a criminal defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to confrontation when said certificates are admitted into evidence without testimony from the individual(s) who prepared the certificates and performed the testing?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*170 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of April 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner is:

Does the admission into evidence of accuracy and calibration certificates for breath test machines violate a criminal defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to confrontation when said certificates are admitted into evidence without testimony from the individual(s) who prepared the certificates and performed the testing?

Commonwealth v. DYARMAN, 41 A.3d 1282, 615 Pa. 169, 2012 WL 1255144, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 831 (Pa. 2012).

Pincite

41 A.3d 1282 (Commonwealth v. DYARMAN) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.