Commonwealth v. Durham

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Commonwealth v. Durham

359 N.E.2d 661, 5 Mass. App. Ct. 777, 1977 Mass. App. LEXIS 733

DecidedFebruary 9, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 359 N.E.2d 661 (Commonwealth v. Durham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Durham, 359 N.E.2d 661, 5 Mass. App. Ct. 777, 1977 Mass. App. LEXIS 733 (Mass. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Following a jury waived trial the defendant was convicted on two counts of an indictment which charged assault and battery with a dangerous weapon and on another indictment which charged him with deriving support and maintenance from the earnings of a prostitute. He has appealed pursuant to G. L. c. 278, §§ 33A-33G. As the assigned errors argued here are not based upon any exceptions taken at trial, they bring nothing to the court for review. Commonwealth v. Foley, 358 Mass. 233, 236 (1970). Commonwealth v. Durham, 358 Mass. 808 (1970). Commonwealth v. Cooper, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 782 (1976). The defendant has requested, however, that we examine the evidence to determine whether there “is a substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice” to justify setting aside the findings. Commonwealth v. Freeman, 352 Mass. 556, 564 (1967). Commonwealth v. Borges, 2 Mass. App. Ct. 869, 870 (1974). We have reviewed the entire record and are of the opinion that there is nothing to suggest the possibility of any such risk in this case.

Judgments affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Following a jury waived trial the defendant was convicted on two counts of an indictment which charged assault and battery with a dangerous weapon and on another indictment which charged him with deriving support and maintenance from the earnings of a prostitute. He has appealed pursuant to G. L. c. 278, §§ 33A-33G. As the assigned errors argued here are not based upon any exceptions taken at trial, they bring nothing to the court for review. Commonwealth v. Foley, 358 Mass. 233, 236 (1970). Commonwealth v. Durham, 358 Mass. 808 (1970). Commonwealth v. Cooper, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 782 (1976). The defendant has requested, however, that we examine the evidence to determine whether there “is a substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice” to justify setting aside the findings. Commonwealth v. Freeman, 352 Mass. 556, 564 (1967). Commonwealth v. Borges, 2 Mass. App. Ct. 869, 870 (1974). We have reviewed the entire record and are of the opinion that there is nothing to suggest the possibility of any such risk in this case.

Judgments affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

359 N.E.2d 661, 5 Mass. App. Ct. 777, 1977 Mass. App. LEXIS 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-durham-massappct-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack