Commonwealth v. Dunn

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Dunn

95 A.3d 272

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 1, 2014·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

[273] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of July, 2014, it is hereby ordered that the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the decision of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to that court in light of this Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Gary, 91 A.3d 102 (Pa.2014). See Gary, at 138 (holding Pennsylvania law governing warrantless searches of motor vehicles is coextensive with federal law). Jurisdiction relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[273] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of July, 2014, it is hereby ordered that the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the decision of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to that court in light of this Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Gary, 91 A.3d 102 (Pa.2014). See Gary, at 138 (holding Pennsylvania law governing warrantless searches of motor vehicles is coextensive with federal law). Jurisdiction relinquished.

Commonwealth v. Dunn, 95 A.3d 272 (Pa. 2014).

Pincite

95 A.3d 272 (Commonwealth v. Dunn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related