Commonwealth v. Dunlap

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Dunlap

901 A.2d 982, 587 Pa. 510, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 1055

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 27, 2006·No. Petition No. 175 EAL 2004·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of June 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following questions:

Whether the Superior Court’s decision is inconsistent with this Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Banks, 540 Pa. 458, 658 A.2d 752 (1995)?

Whether this Court’s per curiam decisions reversing orders denying suppression of evidence, have precedential value where this Court has specifically cited Banks as the basis for reversal?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of June 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following questions:

Whether the Superior Court’s decision is inconsistent with this Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Banks, 540 Pa. 458, 658 A.2d 752 (1995)?

Whether this Court’s per curiam decisions reversing orders denying suppression of evidence, have precedential value where this Court has specifically cited Banks as the basis for reversal?

Commonwealth v. Dunlap, 901 A.2d 982, 587 Pa. 510, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 1055 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

901 A.2d 982 (Commonwealth v. Dunlap) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related