Commonwealth v. Duncan
This text of 164 S.E.2d 664 (Commonwealth v. Duncan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Department of Mental Hygiene and Hospitals brought this action against David Clyde Bedsaul’s Committee under Code § 37-125.5 (Supp. 1966)
Although Code § 37-125.5 contained no provision for an estate exemption, the Committee contended that the exemption provided [353]*353for under Code § 37-128 (Supp. 1966) applied to a judgment under Code § 37-125.5.
Code .§ 37-128, which permitted the department to recover the expenses of boarding a patient with a private family, provided that the patient’s estate should not be depleted below $2,500. The last sentence of Code § 37-128 provided: “The provisions of [§§ 37-125.1-125.15] shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to collections authorized by this section [ § 37-128].”
The last sentence of Code § 37-128 did not make the provisions of that section applicable to actions under Code § 37-125.5; rather, that sentence made the provisions of Code §§ 37-125.1-125.15 applicable mutatis mutandis to actions under Code § 37-128. The trial court therefore erred in holding that the estate exemption applied to this action under Code § 37-125.5. The judgment is modified accordingly.
Modified, affirmed, and final judgment.
In 1968 the General Assembly repealed Title 37 of the Code and enacted Title 37.1 in lieu thereof. Va. Acts of Assembly 1968, ch. 477.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
164 S.E.2d 664, 209 Va. 352, 1968 Va. LEXIS 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-duncan-va-1968.