Commonwealth v. Dulaney

356 A.2d 823, 238 Pa. Super. 739
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 5, 1976·No. Appeal, No. 1243·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

Jacobs, Hoffman and Spaeth, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Commonwealth v. Carter, 236 Pa. Superior Ct. 376, 382, 344 A.2d 899, 902 (1975).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Dulaney, 356 A.2d 823, 238 Pa. Super. 739 (Pa. Ct. App. 1976).

356 A.2d 823 (Commonwealth v. Dulaney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Carter
393 A.2d 660 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)