Commonwealth v. Duke

241 A.2d 349, 212 Pa. Super. 720, 1968 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1221
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 10, 1968
DocketAppeal, No. 110
StatusPublished

This text of 241 A.2d 349 (Commonwealth v. Duke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Duke, 241 A.2d 349, 212 Pa. Super. 720, 1968 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1221 (Pa. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Per Curiam :

In accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court in Commonwealth v. Hoffman, 426 Pa. 226, 232 A. 2d 623, the order is vacated and the record is remanded to the lower court with instructions to .appoint counsel to represent appellant in a post-con[721]*721viction proceeding at which his eligibility for an evidentiary hearing and/or other relief may be determined.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Hoffman
232 A.2d 623 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 A.2d 349, 212 Pa. Super. 720, 1968 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-duke-pasuperct-1968.