Commonwealth v. Dowdican
114 Mass. 257
Opinion
1. The testimony of the witness Knowles was competent.
2. The instructions given were apt and sufficient, and adopted in substance the defendant’s prayer.
8. The other questions raised are decided in Commonwealth v Owens, ante, 252.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Dowdican, 114 Mass. 257 (Mass. 1873).
114 Mass. 257 (Commonwealth v. Dowdican) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sibert v. Garrett
246 S.W. 455 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1922)
Lewinsohn v. United States
278 F. 421 (Seventh Circuit, 1921)
Patton v. State
1921 OK CR 191 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1921)
Nussbaumer v. State
54 Fla. 87 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1907)
Bennett v. Meehan
83 Ind. 566 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1882)