Commonwealth v. Dougherty

72 Mass. 349
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1856
StatusPublished

This text of 72 Mass. 349 (Commonwealth v. Dougherty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Dougherty, 72 Mass. 349 (Mass. 1856).

Opinion

By the Court.

This complaint cannot be maintained under St. 1846, c. 52, entitled an act concerning wilful and malicious injuries to personal property in certain cases,” because it does not show that the cabbages were personal property. They may .have been so growing upon the land as to be part of the realty, and the terms of the complaint imply that they were so.

The complaint seems rather to have been- intended to be framed upon St. 1855, c. 457, which provides that “ every person who shall wilfully and maliciously enter any orchard, nursery, [350]*350garden or cranberry meadow, and take away, mutilate or'destroy any tree, shrub or vine, or steal, taire and carry away any fruit or flower, without the consent of the owner thereof, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor.” But under that statute it cannot be maintained, for want of the essential averment of an unlawful entry. In many cases, civil and criminal, the unlawful entry is the gist of the action, although the circumstances may aggravate the trespass. For aught that appears .in this complaint, the defendant may have been upon the premises lawfully.

Judgment arrested.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 Mass. 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-dougherty-mass-1856.