Commonwealth v. Dougherty, D.
This text of Commonwealth v. Dougherty, D. (Commonwealth v. Dougherty, D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 512 EAL 2020 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : DANIEL DOUGHERTY, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all
remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner is:
Where [petitioner’s] testimony at his first trial was induced by the ineffective assistance of counsel, did the trial court commit reversible error by admitting that testimony at his third trial?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Dougherty, D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-dougherty-d-pa-2021.