Commonwealth v. Dougalewicz, Jr., R., Pet

123 A.3d 1063
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 16, 2015·No. 165 WAL 2015 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of October, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, condensed for brevity, are:

(1) Did the Superior Court err when it ruled that suppression was not a remedy available to the Court when stored electronic communications are seized pursuant to an illegally issued warrant?
(2) Did the Court err in ruling that the search and seizure of stored electronic communications pursuant to an illegally issued search warrant for evidence located outside of the jurisdiction of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania did not rise to the level of a constitutional violation of the individual’s privacy rights as guaranteed by Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution or the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Dougalewicz, Jr., R., Pet, 123 A.3d 1063 (Pa. 2015).

123 A.3d 1063 (Commonwealth v. Dougalewicz, Jr., R., Pet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.