Commonwealth v. Dorris

8 Pa. D. & C. 210, 1926 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 218
Philadelphia County Court of Oyer and Terminer·Decided July 2, 1926·No. No. 258·Published

Opinions

Davis, J.,

The above cause came on for argument on June 25, 1926, upon motion for a new trial, before Hon. Charles E. Bartlett, Hon.. James G. Gordon, Jr., and Hon. Howard A. Davis. The defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree. After argument by counsel and a careful consideration of the testimony, the charge of the court and the law, we are of opinion that the verdict of the jury convicting the defendant of murder of the first degree and recommending the penalty of death, was justified under the law and the evidence.

The motion for a new trial is discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Dorris, 8 Pa. D. & C. 210, 1926 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 218 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1926).

8 Pa. D. & C. 210 (Commonwealth v. Dorris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. . Huter
77 N.E. 6 (New York Court of Appeals, 1906)
People v. . Giro
90 N.E. 432 (New York Court of Appeals, 1910)
Dolan v. . People
64 N.Y. 485 (New York Court of Appeals, 1876)
People v. . Marwig
125 N.E. 535 (New York Court of Appeals, 1919)
Pinkard v. State
30 Ga. 757 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1860)
Commonwealth v. Morrison
109 A. 878 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)
Commonwealth v. Lessner
118 A. 24 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)
State v. Allen
47 Conn. 121 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1879)
State v. Kinchen
52 So. 185 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1910)