Commonwealth v. Dong Lee

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Dong Lee

67 Pa. Super. 168, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 365

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 13, 1917

DocketAppeal, No. 25

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 67 Pa. Super. 168 (Commonwealth v. Dong Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Dong Lee, 67 Pa. Super. 168, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 365 (Pa. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Orlady, P. J.,

Every question raised by the assignments of error has been so fairly considered and convincingly answered in the charge of the court, and in the opinion refusing a new trial, that it is not necessary to consider the alleged error in detail. The jury was clearly and adequately instructed in regard to every phase of the defense. The effect to be given to the evidence of good character; the degree of proof required to establish the defendant’s guilt, and the effect to be given to the testimony of an admitted accomplice, were carefully and adequately explained to the jury.

After a fair trial the defendant was convicted, and on further consideration by the court a new trial was refused.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Orlady, P. J.,

Every question raised by the assignments of error has been so fairly considered and convincingly answered in the charge of the court, and in the opinion refusing a new trial, that it is not necessary to consider the alleged error in detail. The jury was clearly and adequately instructed in regard to every phase of the defense. The effect to be given to the evidence of good character; the degree of proof required to establish the defendant’s guilt, and the effect to be given to the testimony of an admitted accomplice, were carefully and adequately explained to the jury.

After a fair trial the defendant was convicted, and on further consideration by the court a new trial was refused.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 Pa. Super. 168, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-dong-lee-pasuperct-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack