Commonwealth v. Dong Lee

67 Pa. Super. 168, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 365
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 13, 1917·No. Appeal, No. 25·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Orlady, P. J.,

Every question raised by the assignments of error has been so fairly considered and convincingly answered in the charge of the court, and in the opinion refusing a new trial, that it is not necessary to consider the alleged error in detail. The jury was clearly and adequately instructed in regard to every phase of the defense. The effect to be given to the evidence of good character; the degree of proof required to establish the defendant’s guilt, and the effect to be given to the testimony of an admitted accomplice, were carefully and adequately explained to the jury.

After a fair trial the defendant was convicted, and on further consideration by the court a new trial was refused.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Dong Lee, 67 Pa. Super. 168, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 365 (Pa. Ct. App. 1917).

67 Pa. Super. 168 (Commonwealth v. Dong Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Nestor
132 A.2d 369 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1957)
Commonwealth v. Hurt
60 A.2d 828 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1948)