Commonwealth v. Distefano, B., Pet
This text of Commonwealth v. Distefano, B., Pet (Commonwealth v. Distefano, B., Pet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 266 WAL 2020 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : BRADY COLLIN DISTEFANO, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 26th day of February, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Did the Superior Court err in reversing the order entered November 14, 2019, by departing from [the] standard of review for the admission or exclusion of evidence and so conflicted with binding precedent inasmuch as the Superior Court engaged in a de novo examination of the challenged evidence rather than reviewing the [t]rial [c]ourt’s exercise of discretion?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Distefano, B., Pet, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-distefano-b-pet-pa-2021.