Commonwealth v. Diori

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Diori

53 Pa. Super. 357, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 180

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 21, 1913

DocketNo. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 53 Pa. Super. 357 (Commonwealth v. Diori) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Diori, 53 Pa. Super. 357, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 180 (Pa. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

The defendant in this appeal was convicted of selling liquor without a license. The facts of the case, the judgment of the court and the assignments of error are substantially the same as in the case of Com. v. this defendant, Joe Diori and Tony Chebocina, ante, p. 353, in whose appeals an opinion is filed herewith, and for the reasons therein given the judgment in this case is affirmed, the record to be remitted to the court below to the end that the defendant appear in the court below at such time as he [358]*358may be there called and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with that part of the sentence which had not been performed at the time this appeal was made a supersedeas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

The defendant in this appeal was convicted of selling liquor without a license. The facts of the case, the judgment of the court and the assignments of error are substantially the same as in the case of Com. v. this defendant, Joe Diori and Tony Chebocina, ante, p. 353, in whose appeals an opinion is filed herewith, and for the reasons therein given the judgment in this case is affirmed, the record to be remitted to the court below to the end that the defendant appear in the court below at such time as he [358]*358may be there called and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with that part of the sentence which had not been performed at the time this appeal was made a supersedeas.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 Pa. Super. 357, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-diori-pasuperct-1913.