Commonwealth v. DiMatteo
166 A.3d 1229, 2017 WL 623444, 2017 Pa. LEXIS 378
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 15, 2017·No. No. 693 MAL 2016·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
[1230] ORDER
AND NOW, this 15th day of February, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:
(1) Whether the Superior Court panel decision is in conflict with the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania’s decision in Commonwealth v. Washington, — Pa. -, 142 A.3d 810 (2016), decided July 19, 2016?
(2) Whether the Superior Court panel decision ordered inappropriate relief, in that, the panel vacated that portion of the plea defendant challenged and remanded for resen-tencing; if defendant is entitled to relief, which he is not, the appropriate relief would be to vacate the entire plea and remand the case for trial on all the original charges?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. DiMatteo, 166 A.3d 1229, 2017 WL 623444, 2017 Pa. LEXIS 378 (Pa. 2017).
166 A.3d 1229 (Commonwealth v. DiMatteo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth, Aplt v. Dimatteo, P.
177 A.3d 182 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2018)
Commonwealth v. Weimer
167 A.3d 78 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)