Commonwealth v. DiFerdinando
257 A.2d 280, 215 Pa. Super. 115, 1969 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1084
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 11, 1969
DocketAppeals, Nos. 35 and 36
StatusPublished
This text of 257 A.2d 280 (Commonwealth v. DiFerdinando) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. DiFerdinando, 257 A.2d 280, 215 Pa. Super. 115, 1969 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1084 (Pa. Ct. App. 1969).
Opinion
Opinion by
In view of our decision this day in Commonwealth v. Chilengarian, 215 Pa. Superior Ct. 112 (1969), we find the court below correctly denied appellant’s motion for a new trial.
The judgment of sentence is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Chilengarian
257 A.2d 279 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1969)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
257 A.2d 280, 215 Pa. Super. 115, 1969 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-diferdinando-pasuperct-1969.