Commonwealth v. DiFerdinando
257 A.2d 280, 215 Pa. Super. 115, 1969 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1084
Opinion
Opinion by
In view of our decision this day in Commonwealth v. Chilengarian, 215 Pa. Superior Ct. 112 (1969), we find the court below correctly denied appellant’s motion for a new trial.
The judgment of sentence is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. DiFerdinando, 257 A.2d 280, 215 Pa. Super. 115, 1969 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1084 (Pa. Ct. App. 1969).
257 A.2d 280 (Commonwealth v. DiFerdinando) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Chilengarian
257 A.2d 279 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1969)