Commonwealth v. Deweese, H.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 7, 2017·No. 387 MAL 2017 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 387 MAL 2017 :

Respondent :

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. :

: :

HOWARD WILLIAM DEWEESE, :

:

Petitioner :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of November, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err in denying PCRA relief where [Petitioner’s] trial counsel failed to preserve for direct appeal the testimony of 14 witnesses who were prevented by the trial counsel from offering exculpatory testimony that was crucial to the defense and that would have directly contradicted the Commonwealth’s primary witnesses at trial?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Deweese, H., (Pa. 2017).

Commonwealth v. Deweese, H. (Commonwealth v. Deweese, H.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.