Commonwealth v. DeSantis

335 A.2d 761, 234 Pa. Super. 67, 1975 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1500
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 31, 1975·No. Appeal, No. 535·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from the dismissal of appellant’s petition under the Post Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA).1 The only issue raised concerns the validity of [68]*68the search warrant under which evidence used against appellant was seized. This issue was raised in post-trial motions, and was decided against appellant. There was no direct appeal from the judgment of sentence, although appellant concedes that he was advised not only of his right to appeal, but that he should appeal. This informed failure to appeal an issue decided below renders the claim raised here “finally litigated,” PCHA §4 (a) (1), 19 P.S. §1180-4 (a) (1), and appellant is not eligible for relief under the Act. PCHA §3(d), 19 P.S. §1180-8 (d).

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. DeSantis, 335 A.2d 761, 234 Pa. Super. 67, 1975 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1500 (Pa. Ct. App. 1975).

335 A.2d 761 (Commonwealth v. DeSantis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Williams
567 A.2d 709 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)