Commonwealth v. Derhammer, J., Pet

116 A.3d 601, 632 Pa. 1, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 1120
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 26, 2015·No. 373 MAL 2014 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of May, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as framed by Petitioner, is as follows:

Did the Superior Court err in affirming the trial judge’s decision precluding the Commonwealth from referencing [Respondent’s] pre-arrest failure to inquire as to the welfare of the victims, specifically the [Respondent’s] spontaneous, self-initiated contact with police, that was not in response to any police questioning, after he arrived at the arson scene of his own volition?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Derhammer, J., Pet, 116 A.3d 601, 632 Pa. 1, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 1120 (Pa. 2015).

116 A.3d 601 (Commonwealth v. Derhammer, J., Pet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Derhammer
134 A.3d 1066 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2016)