Commonwealth v. Derhammer, J., Pet
116 A.3d 601, 632 Pa. 1, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 1120
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 26, 2015
Docket373 MAL 2014 (Granted)
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 116 A.3d 601 (Commonwealth v. Derhammer, J., Pet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Derhammer, J., Pet, 116 A.3d 601, 632 Pa. 1, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 1120 (Pa. 2015).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of May, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as framed by Petitioner, is as follows:
Did the Superior Court err in affirming the trial judge’s decision precluding the Commonwealth from referencing [Respondent’s] pre-arrest failure to inquire as to the welfare of the victims, specifically the [Respondent’s] spontaneous, self-initiated contact with police, that was not in response to any police questioning, after he arrived at the arson scene of his own volition?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Derhammer
134 A.3d 1066 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2016)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
116 A.3d 601, 632 Pa. 1, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 1120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-derhammer-j-pet-pa-2015.