Commonwealth v. Delano
This text of 83 N.E. 406 (Commonwealth v. Delano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only argument put forward by the defendant is that although the act here complained of was an “unnatural and lascivious act with another person ” it was not an act of copulation and that for that reason on the authority of what was stated obiter in Commonwealth v. Dill, 160 Mass. 636, 537, it is an act not within R. L. c. 212, § 27.
It is plain that St. 1887, c. 436, now R. L. c. 212, § 27, was intended to make criminal any and all unnatural and lascivious [167]*167acts with another person. Copulation is the natural act of coition and is not within the statute. It is evident that the word “ copulation ” was not used accurately in the opinion in Commonwealth v. Dill, 160 Mass. 536, 537.
Verdict to stand.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
83 N.E. 406, 197 Mass. 166, 1908 Mass. LEXIS 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-delano-mass-1908.