Commonwealth v. DeCoursey

7 Pa. Super. 396, 1898 Pa. Super. LEXIS 312
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 17, 1898
DocketAppeal, No. 204
StatusPublished

This text of 7 Pa. Super. 396 (Commonwealth v. DeCoursey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. DeCoursey, 7 Pa. Super. 396, 1898 Pa. Super. LEXIS 312 (Pa. Ct. App. 1898).

Opinion

Opinion by

Wickham, J.,

This case, in its main, features, is not distinguishable from Commonwealth v. Murr, 7 Pa. Superior Ct. 391, except that it does not appear, from the record, that any witness who was asked, in behalf of the commonwealth as to the reputation of the defendant’s house, gave any reply whatsoever to the questions put to him. For this reason, as well as the reasons given in Commonwealth v. Murr, supra, the decision wherein has, this day, been handed down, the specifications of error, all whereof are similar to those in the case above referred to, must be overruled.

The judgment is affirmed and it is directed, that the record be remitted to the court below, in order that the sentence may be enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Murr
7 Pa. Super. 391 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Pa. Super. 396, 1898 Pa. Super. LEXIS 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-decoursey-pasuperct-1898.