Commonwealth v. Dearborn

15 Mass. 125
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1818
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 15 Mass. 125 (Commonwealth v. Dearborn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Dearborn, 15 Mass. 125 (Mass. 1818).

Opinion

The Court

were of opinion that the prerogative of the government did not authorize the mode of pleading attempted, and the demurrer was withdrawn.

The issue in fact was joined by the defendants, and being tried [118]*118during the term, the other point was reserved for argument, and the cause stood continued nisi for that purpose.

The counsel on both sides being present at the following Novem ber term in Essex, the question whether the information lay was argued at much length by them ; and it was afterwards determined by the Court, that the defendants, as managers of a lottery granted to a corporation, and appointed to the trust by the corpotation, were not such * officers as were liable to the process which had been instituted in this case. They were the private officers or servants of the corporation, and removable by it at pleasure, or at least for good cause. The only effect of a judgment against the defendants upon this information would be their removal from office. But such a judgment would be nugatory, for the corporation might immediately reinstate them. Those against whom such an information lies must claim to exercise some public office or authority. The defendants were accordingly discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burkett v. Ulmer
15 A.2d 858 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1940)
State Ex Rel. Jones v. Carradine
147 So. 554 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1928)
State Ex Rel. Stage v. MacKie
74 A. 759 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1909)
Haupt v. Rogers
48 N.E. 1080 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1898)
Attorney General v. Drohan
48 N.E. 279 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1897)
Attorney General v. Sullivan
28 L.R.A. 455 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)
Kilauea Sugar Co. v. Macfie
5 Haw. 3 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1883)
State ex rel. Woodford v. North
42 Conn. 79 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1875)
Reed v. Cumberland & Oxford Canal Corp.
65 Me. 53 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1874)
People ex rel. McConville v. Hills
1 Lans. 202 (New York Supreme Court, 1869)
Smith v. State
21 Ark. 294 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1860)
Goddard v. Smithett
69 Mass. 116 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1854)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Mass. 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-dearborn-mass-1818.