Commonwealth v. Davis

69 Ky. 295, 6 Bush 295, 1869 Ky. LEXIS 144
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided December 8, 1869·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

JUDGE ROBERTSON

delivered the opinion op the court.

According to the principles adjudged in the Commonwealth v. Turner, 4 Dana, 511, and which we reaffirm as sound and applicable to this case, the county court erred in dismissing the proceeding in bastardy.

The only difference between this case and that is, that in that the dismission on the mother’s compromise was against her protest in court, and in this she moved it herself. But the controlling principle is the same in each case, and applies equally to both.

After the proceeding had been initiated, and the court had acquired jurisdiction over it,, the mother had no legal control over it.

Wherefore the judgment of dismission in this case is reversed, and the cause remanded for further prosecution for the relief of the county and the benefit of the bastard.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Davis, 69 Ky. 295, 6 Bush 295, 1869 Ky. LEXIS 144 (Ky. Ct. App. 1869).

69 Ky. 295 (Commonwealth v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Preece v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Maynard
80 S.W.2d 602 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1935)
Crabtree v. Commonwealth, by Emily Chism
281 S.W. 162 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1926)
Meyer v. Meyer
102 N.W. 52 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1905)
Alderson v. Alderson's Guardian
69 S.W. 700 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1902)
Billingsley v. Clelland
23 S.E. 812 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1895)