Commonwealth v. Davidson
This text of 871 A.2d 185 (Commonwealth v. Davidson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*357 ORDER
AND NOW, this 15th day of March 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following questions:
Whether 18 Pa.C.S. § 6312(d) is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad?
Did the General Assembly intend that a person charged under 18 Pa.C.S. § 6312(d) be subjected to individual counts for each piece of child pornography possessed?
If the General Assembly so intended, is it constitutional to impose separate punishments for each conviction?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
871 A.2d 185, 582 Pa. 356, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-davidson-pa-2005.