Commonwealth v. Davidson
871 A.2d 185, 582 Pa. 356, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 446
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 15, 2005·No. Appeal 1090 MAL 2004·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
*357 ORDER
AND NOW, this 15th day of March 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following questions:
Whether 18 Pa.C.S. § 6312(d) is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad?
Did the General Assembly intend that a person charged under 18 Pa.C.S. § 6312(d) be subjected to individual counts for each piece of child pornography possessed?
If the General Assembly so intended, is it constitutional to impose separate punishments for each conviction?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Davidson, 871 A.2d 185, 582 Pa. 356, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 446 (Pa. 2005).
871 A.2d 185 (Commonwealth v. Davidson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Cruz
919 A.2d 279 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2007)
Commonwealth v. Koehler
914 A.2d 427 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)
Commonwealth v. Pepe
897 A.2d 463 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)