Commonwealth v. Dam

107 Mass. 210
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1871
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 107 Mass. 210 (Commonwealth v. Dam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Dam, 107 Mass. 210 (Mass. 1871).

Opinion

By the Coubt.

The ruling of the judge as to the order in which this evidence was introduced, being within his discretion, was not subject to exceptions. Commonwealth v. Moulton, 4 Gray, 39. The evidence was relevant; for both the conduct of the lewd persons who met at the shop, and the admission of the defendant, tended to show that they went from the shop to the tenement for the purpose of making it a nuisance in the manner alleged in the

indictment.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. United States
21 F.2d 32 (Eighth Circuit, 1927)
Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Phipps
125 F. 478 (Eighth Circuit, 1903)
Howes v. Colburn
43 N.E. 125 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1896)
Goldsby v. United States
160 U.S. 70 (Supreme Court, 1895)
Bowman v. Eppinger
44 N.W. 1000 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1890)
Rounds v. State
14 N.W. 865 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 Mass. 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-dam-mass-1871.