Commonwealth v. Dam
107 Mass. 210
Opinion
The ruling of the judge as to the order in which this evidence was introduced, being within his discretion, was not subject to exceptions. Commonwealth v. Moulton, 4 Gray, 39. The evidence was relevant; for both the conduct of the lewd persons who met at the shop, and the admission of the defendant, tended to show that they went from the shop to the tenement for the purpose of making it a nuisance in the manner alleged in the
indictment.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Dam, 107 Mass. 210 (Mass. 1871).
107 Mass. 210 (Commonwealth v. Dam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller v. United States
21 F.2d 32 (Eighth Circuit, 1927)
Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Phipps
125 F. 478 (Eighth Circuit, 1903)
Howes v. Colburn
43 N.E. 125 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1896)
Goldsby v. United States
160 U.S. 70 (Supreme Court, 1895)
Bowman v. Eppinger
44 N.W. 1000 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1890)
Rounds v. State
14 N.W. 865 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1883)