Commonwealth v. Daly

19 N.E. 209, 148 Mass. 428, 1889 Mass. LEXIS 284
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 5, 1889·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The complaint charges the sale of intoxicating liquor to one Latter. The defendant admitted that he sold lager beer to said Latter, and offered to show, as a defence, that he intended to sell, and supposed he was selling, “ tonic beer,” and not lager beer. It has been repeatedly held, that, if a man sells or keeps for sale intoxicating liquor, it is no. defence that he does not know it to be intoxicating, or that he supposed it to be something else. Commonwealth v. Savery, 145 Mass. 212, and cases cited. The ruling at the trial was in accordance with these cases, and was correct. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Daly, 19 N.E. 209, 148 Mass. 428, 1889 Mass. LEXIS 284 (Mass. 1889).

19 N.E. 209 (Commonwealth v. Daly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Ober
189 N.E. 601 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1934)
Commonwealth v. Criscuolo
7 Pa. D. & C. 446 (Philadelphia County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1926)
Commonwealth v. Mixer
93 N.E. 249 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1910)
Commonwealth v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
88 N.E. 764 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1909)
Commonwealth v. Lavery
73 N.E. 884 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1905)
Commonwealth v. Joslin
21 L.R.A. 449 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1893)
Commonwealth v. Gould
33 N.E. 656 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1893)
Commonwealth v. O'Kean
26 N.E. 97 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1891)