Commonwealth v. Dallas
4 U.S. 200
This text of 4 U.S. 200 (Commonwealth v. Dallas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Dallas, 4 U.S. 200 (1801).
Opinion
— That although the Recorder of the city of Philadelphia possesses some powers, and performs some duties, of a judicial nature, he is not a judge, within the terms, spirit and meaning of the 8th section of the 2d article of the constitution.
The motion for leave to file an information in the nature of a quo warranto, was, therefore, refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Alvarez-Calo v. Obenland
W.D. Washington, 2023
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 U.S. 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-dallas-pa-1801.