Commonwealth v. Czarnecki

292 A.2d 422, 221 Pa. Super. 303, 1972 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1520
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 15, 1972
DocketAppeal, No. 1161
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 292 A.2d 422 (Commonwealth v. Czarnecki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Czarnecki, 292 A.2d 422, 221 Pa. Super. 303, 1972 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1520 (Pa. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Prior to indictment appellant was incarcerated in another county. He complains that he had no preliminary hearing before trial. Commonwealth v. O’Brien, 181 Pa. Superior Ct. 382, 124 A. 2d 666 (1956). specifically holds that a person imprisoned in another county need not be given a preliminary hearing and may be proceeded against by use of a district attorney’s bill with the approval of the court. The record reveals compliance with the proper procedure.

Order affirmed.

Jacobs, J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Shirk
323 A.2d 99 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1974)
Commonwealth v. Brabham
309 A.2d 824 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
292 A.2d 422, 221 Pa. Super. 303, 1972 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-czarnecki-pasuperct-1972.