Commonwealth v. Cutter
This text of 98 Mass. 31 (Commonwealth v. Cutter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The declaration sets forth all the facts which are necessary to give the magistrate jurisdiction, and it is not necessary to add to them an averment that he had jurisdiction.
2. The paper declared on is in form a recognizance. It states the sum in which the recognizors bound themselves, and the condition of the obligation; and this is prefaced by a statement of the facts which authorized the magistrate to take the recognizance. It conforms to the provisions of the statute (Gen. Sts. c. 124, § 10,) and indicates sufficiently what examination is to be had, and before what magistrate it is to take place. The defendants’ counsel does not ooLit out any material variance from the words of the statute.
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
98 Mass. 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-cutter-mass-1867.