Commonwealth v. Curry
This text of 386 A.2d 32 (Commonwealth v. Curry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The judgment of sentence is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with Commonwealth v. McCusker, -Pa. - (No. 2850 Allocatur Docket, Filed September 21, 1977). Upon remand the lower court must advise appellant as provided in Rule 1405(c), Pa.R.Crim.P. (added June 29, 1977, effective September 1, 1977); appellant should comply with the procedure set forth in Rule 321, Pa.R.Crim.P. See Commonwealth v. Marzik, 255 Pa. Super. -, 388 A.2d 340 (1978) (concurring opinion by SPAETH, J.).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
386 A.2d 32, 254 Pa. Super. 444, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-curry-pasuperct-1978.