Commonwealth v. Curry

386 A.2d 32, 254 Pa. Super. 444, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2846
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 13, 1978
DocketNo. 266
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 386 A.2d 32 (Commonwealth v. Curry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Curry, 386 A.2d 32, 254 Pa. Super. 444, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2846 (Pa. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of sentence is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with Commonwealth v. McCusker, -Pa. - (No. 2850 Allocatur Docket, Filed September 21, 1977). Upon remand the lower court must advise appellant as provided in Rule 1405(c), Pa.R.Crim.P. (added June 29, 1977, effective September 1, 1977); appellant should comply with the procedure set forth in Rule 321, Pa.R.Crim.P. See Commonwealth v. Marzik, 255 Pa. Super. -, 388 A.2d 340 (1978) (concurring opinion by SPAETH, J.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Heeman
433 A.2d 477 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)
Commonwealth v. Heeman
393 A.2d 1021 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
386 A.2d 32, 254 Pa. Super. 444, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-curry-pasuperct-1978.