Commonwealth v. Curley

101 Mass. 24
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 15, 1869·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Colt, J.

Under the provisions of the Gen. Sts. c. 178, §§ 6, 7, the whole yard of a house of correction, though divided by a public street, against which it is suitably fenced and protected, must be regarded as adjoining or appurtenant within the terms of the statute. It is not required that the yard shall be immediately connected with the house itself. If it be a place entirely devoted to the purpose, sufficiently secure and suitably protected from all persons without, it is sufficient. The word appurtenant is not used in a technical sense in the statute, for land cannot be appurtenant to land, strictly speaking.

Judgment upon the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Curley, 101 Mass. 24 (Mass. 1869).

101 Mass. 24 (Commonwealth v. Curley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sturges v. Town of Chilmark
402 N.E.2d 1346 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1980)
Commonwealth v. Gosselin
301 N.E.2d 870 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1973)
Gruver-Cooley Jade Corporation v. Perlis
251 A.2d 589 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1969)
State v. Blan
69 Mo. 317 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1879)