Commonwealth v. Cullen-Doyle

138 A.3d 609, 635 Pa. 502, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1154

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 7, 2016·No. No. 63 WAL 2016·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

(1) Whether Petitioner is eligible for the RRRI program where he is convicted and being sentenced for a single count of first degree burglary, which he admits is a crime of violence, but where he has no other convictions demonstrating a “history of present or past violent behavior,” as that term is used in the RRRI Act?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

(1) Whether Petitioner is eligible for the RRRI program where he is convicted and being sentenced for a single count of first degree burglary, which he admits is a crime of violence, but where he has no other convictions demonstrating a “history of present or past violent behavior,” as that term is used in the RRRI Act?

Commonwealth v. Cullen-Doyle, 138 A.3d 609, 635 Pa. 502, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1154 (Pa. 2016).

Pincite

138 A.3d 609 (Commonwealth v. Cullen-Doyle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Commonwealth v. Cullen-Doyle, S., Aplt.

164 A.3d 1239 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)

Opinion

Related