Commonwealth v. Cruttenden
21 A.3d 680, 610 Pa. 454, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1396
This text of 21 A.3d 680 (Commonwealth v. Cruttenden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Cruttenden, 21 A.3d 680, 610 Pa. 454, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1396 (Pa. 2011).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of June, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal i: GRANTED. The issue, as presented by Petitioner, is:
Does a police officer violate the Wiretap Act by pretending to be an accomplice and communicating directly with a suspect by text messaging?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
21 A.3d 680, 610 Pa. 454, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-cruttenden-pa-2011.