Commonwealth v. Crosby, C.: of Bradley, Esq.
This text of Commonwealth v. Crosby, C.: of Bradley, Esq. (Commonwealth v. Crosby, C.: of Bradley, Esq.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : No. 103 MM 2022 : : v. : : : CLIFF CROSBY : : : PETITION OF: SPENCER H.C. BRADLEY, : ESQUIRE :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 10th day of February, 2023, in consideration of the Application to
Withdraw as Counsel, this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of
Dauphin County for that court to determine whether to grant Attorney Spencer H.C.
Bradley leave to withdraw.
A criminal defense attorney’s duty of representation continues until a court permits
the attorney to withdraw. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 120(B)(1) (specifying that counsel for a
criminal “defendant may not withdraw his or her appearance except by leave of court”).
In the absence of a court’s permission to withdraw, the lawyer’s duty of representation
continues through review in this Court. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 122(B)(2) and Comment.
In the event the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County permits Attorney
Bradley to withdraw, the court is to resolve any other related questions, including whether
to appoint counsel to represent Cliff Crosby on allocatur review.
The Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County is DIRECTED to enter its order
on remand within 90 days and to inform this Court promptly of its determination.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Crosby, C.: of Bradley, Esq., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-crosby-c-of-bradley-esq-pa-2023.