Commonwealth v. Crommie

8 Watts & Serg. 339
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 15, 1845·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The form of the assent is immaterial; but it must be expressed before the magistrate at the time of the binding, which is the time material to the validity of the act; and it must be a written accompaniment of the indenture. In this instance, the mother was not the parent indicated by the statute; and as the father was not present, and did not attest the paper, or give any other written expression of his assent to it, the binding was void.

Apprentice discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Crommie, 8 Watts & Serg. 339 (Pa. 1845).

8 Watts & Serg. 339 (Commonwealth v. Crommie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Com. ex rel. Irvin v. Penott
1 Brightly 189 (Philadelphia Court of Nisi Prius, 1849)