Commonwealth v. Crider

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Crider

599 A.2d 624, 528 Pa. 546

DecidedJune 25, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 599 A.2d 624 (Commonwealth v. Crider) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Crider, 599 A.2d 624, 528 Pa. 546 (Pa. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of November, 1991, the Petition is granted limited to the issue of ineffectiveness of counsel regarding Petitioner’s right to testify on his own behalf. Insofar as it affirms the denial of filing supplemental post-verdict motions claiming ineffectiveness of counsel, the Order of the Superior Court is reversed. In all other respects, the Order of Superior Court is affirmed. The case is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas for an evidentiary hearing on Petitioner’s motion for supplemental post-verdict motions regarding his right to testify.

Jurisdiction relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of November, 1991, the Petition is granted limited to the issue of ineffectiveness of counsel regarding Petitioner’s right to testify on his own behalf. Insofar as it affirms the denial of filing supplemental post-verdict motions claiming ineffectiveness of counsel, the Order of the Superior Court is reversed. In all other respects, the Order of Superior Court is affirmed. The case is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas for an evidentiary hearing on Petitioner’s motion for supplemental post-verdict motions regarding his right to testify.

Jurisdiction relinquished.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

599 A.2d 624, 528 Pa. 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-crider-pa-1991.