Commonwealth v. Crawford

111 Mass. 422
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

1. There is nothing in the bill of exceptions to show that the proper papers were not transmitted to the Supe, rior Court, as required by the St. of 1862, c. 217, § 3.

2. The papers transmitted were properly attested. It is within the scope of the powers conferred by the statutes upon the assist* [423] ant clerks of the Municipal Court, for them to attest the papers transmitted to the Superior Court.

3. There was no error in allowing an attested copy of the complaint to go to the jury. The defendant certainly was not injured by allowing such copy to go to the jury instead of a full copy of the papers containing a record of his conviction and sentence in the court below. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Crawford, 111 Mass. 422 (Mass. 1873).

111 Mass. 422 (Commonwealth v. Crawford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sodekson v. Lynch
9 N.E.2d 372 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1937)
Commonwealth v. Keenan
5 N.E. 477 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1886)