Commonwealth v. Council

331 A.2d 795, 231 Pa. Super. 155, 1974 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1320
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 11, 1974
DocketAppeal, No. 269
StatusPublished

This text of 331 A.2d 795 (Commonwealth v. Council) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Council, 331 A.2d 795, 231 Pa. Super. 155, 1974 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1320 (Pa. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

Opinion by

Jacobs, J.,

In this direct appeal from a conviction on a charge of receiving stolen goods1 the appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction. We, however, are precluded from reaching the merits of the case in this direct appeal because the appellant did not file post-trial motions in the court below.

“The swift and orderly administration of criminal justice requires that lower courts be given the opportunity to rectify their errors before they are considered on appeal.” Commonwealth v. Reid, 458 Pa. 357, 358, 326 A.2d 267, 267-268 (1974). Issues not presented to the trial court in post-verdict motions will not be considered on appeal. Commonwealth v. Staples, 457 Pa. 468, 326 A.2d 317 (1974).

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Reid
326 A.2d 267 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1974)
Commonwealth v. Staples
326 A.2d 317 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
331 A.2d 795, 231 Pa. Super. 155, 1974 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-council-pasuperct-1974.