Commonwealth v. Correll
This text of 1 Ky. Op. 406 (Commonwealth v. Correll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the Court by
Appellee took the horse from Armstrong in obedience to the command of his superior officer and delivered him to the officer to whom he was ordered to deliver him, and he was, as the evidence conduces to show, put into the service of the government.
We are not, therefore, prepared to say that appellee by the execution of an order of his superior officer in precisely the manner he was commanded to. do thereby subjected himself to a criminal or penal prosecution.
Whether or not he would be responsible in a civil action to the party who was deprived of his property by him, although he did it in obedience to orders, is a question not now before us and about which we express no ojtinion.
The judgment of the court below is, therefore, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Ky. Op. 406, 1866 Ky. LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-correll-kyctapp-1866.