Commonwealth v. Coplin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Coplin

319 A.2d 669, 456 Pa. 529, 1974 Pa. LEXIS 562

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 22, 1974·No. No. 1299·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

The petition for allocatur is granted. We agree with the reasoning of the Opinion in Support of Reversal in the Superior Court that the evidence is insufficient to sustain appellant’s conviction of larceny. Commonwealth v. Coplin, 226 Pa. Superior Ct. 146, 147, 313 A.2d 349, 349 (1973) (Spaeth, J., Opinion in Support of Reversal, joined by Jacobs and Hoffman, JJ.).

The judgment of sentence is reversed and appellant discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

The petition for allocatur is granted. We agree with the reasoning of the Opinion in Support of Reversal in the Superior Court that the evidence is insufficient to sustain appellant’s conviction of larceny. Commonwealth v. Coplin, 226 Pa. Superior Ct. 146, 147, 313 A.2d 349, 349 (1973) (Spaeth, J., Opinion in Support of Reversal, joined by Jacobs and Hoffman, JJ.).

The judgment of sentence is reversed and appellant discharged.

Commonwealth v. Coplin, 319 A.2d 669, 456 Pa. 529, 1974 Pa. LEXIS 562 (Pa. 1974).

Pincite

319 A.2d 669 (Commonwealth v. Coplin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related