Commonwealth v. Coplin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Coplin

319 A.2d 669, 456 Pa. 529, 1974 Pa. LEXIS 562

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 22, 1974

DocketNo. 1299

StatusPublished

This text of 319 A.2d 669 (Commonwealth v. Coplin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Coplin, 319 A.2d 669, 456 Pa. 529, 1974 Pa. LEXIS 562 (Pa. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

The petition for allocatur is granted. We agree with the reasoning of the Opinion in Support of Reversal in the Superior Court that the evidence is insufficient to sustain appellant’s conviction of larceny. Commonwealth v. Coplin, 226 Pa. Superior Ct. 146, 147, 313 A.2d 349, 349 (1973) (Spaeth, J., Opinion in Support of Reversal, joined by Jacobs and Hoffman, JJ.).

The judgment of sentence is reversed and appellant discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

The petition for allocatur is granted. We agree with the reasoning of the Opinion in Support of Reversal in the Superior Court that the evidence is insufficient to sustain appellant’s conviction of larceny. Commonwealth v. Coplin, 226 Pa. Superior Ct. 146, 147, 313 A.2d 349, 349 (1973) (Spaeth, J., Opinion in Support of Reversal, joined by Jacobs and Hoffman, JJ.).

The judgment of sentence is reversed and appellant discharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

319 A.2d 669, 456 Pa. 529, 1974 Pa. LEXIS 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-coplin-pa-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack