Commonwealth v. Connolly

89 Pa. Super. 243, 1926 Pa. Super. LEXIS 40
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 16, 1926
DocketAppeal 175
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 89 Pa. Super. 243 (Commonwealth v. Connolly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Connolly, 89 Pa. Super. 243, 1926 Pa. Super. LEXIS 40 (Pa. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Opinion by

Porter, P. J.,

This appeal involves only the same questions which have been considered in opinions this day filed in the cases of Commonwealth v. Hunsinger and Commonwealth v. Dabbiero, and for the reasons in those opinions stated, the assignments of error are overruled.

The judgment is affirmed and the record remitted to the court below, and it is ordered that the defendant appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with the sentence, or any part of it, which had not been performed at the time the appeal in this case was made a supersedeas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Fiorini
195 A.2d 119 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1963)
Commonwealth v. Connolly
138 A. 682 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 Pa. Super. 243, 1926 Pa. Super. LEXIS 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-connolly-pasuperct-1926.