Commonwealth v. Connolly

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Connolly

89 Pa. Super. 243, 1926 Pa. Super. LEXIS 40

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 16, 1926·No. Appeal 175·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Porter, P. J.,

This appeal involves only the same questions which have been considered in opinions this day filed in the cases of Commonwealth v. Hunsinger and Commonwealth v. Dabbiero, and for the reasons in those opinions stated, the assignments of error are overruled.

The judgment is affirmed and the record remitted to the court below, and it is ordered that the defendant appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with the sentence, or any part of it, which had not been performed at the time the appeal in this case was made a supersedeas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Porter, P. J.,

This appeal involves only the same questions which have been considered in opinions this day filed in the cases of Commonwealth v. Hunsinger and Commonwealth v. Dabbiero, and for the reasons in those opinions stated, the assignments of error are overruled.

The judgment is affirmed and the record remitted to the court below, and it is ordered that the defendant appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with the sentence, or any part of it, which had not been performed at the time the appeal in this case was made a supersedeas.

Commonwealth v. Connolly, 89 Pa. Super. 243, 1926 Pa. Super. LEXIS 40 (Pa. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

89 Pa. Super. 243 (Commonwealth v. Connolly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related