Commonwealth v. Conklin
867 A.2d 1261, 581 Pa. 622, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 67
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 12, 2005
DocketPetition 844 MAL 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 867 A.2d 1261 (Commonwealth v. Conklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Conklin, 867 A.2d 1261, 581 Pa. 622, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 67 (Pa. 2005).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of January, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following issue:
Whether the Commonwealth, as part of its burden of proof in a proceeding to determine whether an individual is a sexually violent predator, must present expert testimony, in the form of a clinical diagnosis by a licensed psychologist or psychiatrist, that the individual suffers from a personality disorder or mental abnormality that makes the person likely to engage in predatory sexually violent offenses.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Conklin
897 A.2d 1168 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
867 A.2d 1261, 581 Pa. 622, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-conklin-pa-2005.