Commonwealth v. Conklin
867 A.2d 1261, 581 Pa. 622, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 67
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 12, 2005·No. Petition 844 MAL 2004·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of January, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following issue:
Whether the Commonwealth, as part of its burden of proof in a proceeding to determine whether an individual is a sexually violent predator, must present expert testimony, in the form of a clinical diagnosis by a licensed psychologist or psychiatrist, that the individual suffers from a personality disorder or mental abnormality that makes the person likely to engage in predatory sexually violent offenses.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Conklin, 867 A.2d 1261, 581 Pa. 622, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 67 (Pa. 2005).
867 A.2d 1261 (Commonwealth v. Conklin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Conklin
897 A.2d 1168 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)