Commonwealth v. Comer
671 A.2d 1135
This text of 671 A.2d 1135 (Commonwealth v. Comer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Comer, 671 A.2d 1135 (Pa. 1996).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 1996, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to Issues II, III, IV, and V as stated in the Petition:
II. Whether the Court below incorrectly concluded that the conviction of Involuntary Manslaughter was based on insufficient evidence?
III. Whether the Court below incorrectly concluded that the conviction for Aggravate ed Assault was based on insufficient evidence or contrary to law?
IV. Whether the Court below incorrectly concluded that Petitioner made a knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to a jury trial under Pa.R.Crim.P. Rule 1101?
V. Whether the Court below incorrectly concluded that Petitioner did not receive multiple punishments for violations of the same offense at one trial in violation of the Double Jeopardy clauses of both the United States and Pennsylvania Constitutions?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
671 A.2d 1135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-comer-pa-1996.