Commonwealth v. Coleman

874 A.2d 1150
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 24, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 874 A.2d 1150 (Commonwealth v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Coleman, 874 A.2d 1150 (Pa. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

And now, this 24th day of May, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED IN PART, and the portion of the order of the Superior Court reimposing respondent’s original sentence is hereby VACATED pursuant to Commonwealth v. Ward, 524 Pa. 48, 568 A.2d 1242, 1244 (1990) (vacating and remanding for resentencing where Superior Court attempted to superimpose its judgment on trial court by directing sentence to be imposed; appellate court has no power to impose sentence, which is power to be exercised exclusively by trial court). The matter is REMANDED to the trial court for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Holiday
954 A.2d 6 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
874 A.2d 1150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-coleman-pa-2005.