Commonwealth v. Cole, C.
This text of Commonwealth v. Cole, C. (Commonwealth v. Cole, C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : No. 109 MM 2017 : : v. : : : CORNELL ANTHONY COLE : : : PETITION OF: KRISTEN LEIGH : WEISENBERGER, ESQUIRE :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 18th day of September, 2017, in consideration of the Application
to Withdraw as Counsel, this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of
Dauphin County for that court to determine whether Petitioner’s current counsel should
be granted leave to withdraw. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 120(B).
If current counsel is permitted to withdraw, the court is DIRECTED to resolve any
issues relative to Petitioner being appointed counsel or granted leave to proceed pro se.
The Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County is DIRECTED to enter its order
regarding this remand within 45 days and to promptly notify this Court of its
determination.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Cole, C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-cole-c-pa-2017.