Commonwealth v. Cohen
This text of 120 Mass. 198 (Commonwealth v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This indictment is against the receiver only, and, though assumed on some parts of the record, and in the briefs of counsel, to contain six counts, really contains only three, each consisting of an allegation of the larceny, followed by a charge against the defendant as receiver of the goods alleged to have been stolen, and which clearly describes those goods by reference to the preceding allegation. The form is usual and sufficient. Stark. Crim. Pl. (2d ed.) 169, 170, 479. D. Davis’s Justice, 451, 452. Davis’s Prec. 37. Commonwealth v. King, 9 Cush. 284, 287. Commonwealth v. Glover, 111 Mass [201]*201395. The validity of the last count is not affected by the nolle prosequi entered upon the other counts against the defendant, The motions to quash, and in arrest of judgment, for insufficiency in the indictment, were rightly overruled.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 Mass. 198, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-cohen-mass-1876.