Commonwealth v. Cogan

107 Mass. 212
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 15, 1871·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

1. The shop described was a tenement, within the meaning of the statute. Commonwealth v. Godley, 11 Gray 454. Commonwealths. McCaughey, 9 Gray, 296.

2. Things adapted to the sale of prohibited liquors may be also adapted tp many innocent- uses. But their existence in this .shop might be proved to the jury, and the instructions given to them as to the effect of such evidence were correct. Commonwealth v. Higgins, 16 Gray, 19.

3. This offence may be committed by a violation of the statute on a single occasion. Commonwealth v. Gallagher, 1 Allen, 592. Commonwealth v. Higgins, 16 Gray, 19.

Fxeeptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Cogan, 107 Mass. 212 (Mass. 1871).

107 Mass. 212 (Commonwealth v. Cogan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reale v. Judges of the Superior Court
265 Mass. 135 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1928)
Commonwealth v. Kerrissey
4 N.E. 820 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1886)
State v. Hoxsie
22 A. 1059 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1885)
Commonwealth v. Mitchell
115 Mass. 141 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1874)
Commonwealth v. Owens
114 Mass. 252 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1873)